Who Is Mary D’Costa? The Name Stirring Mandhana’s Storm

By Harshit - Nov 26, 2025 01:45 PM
Last updated on Nov 26, 2025 01:45 PM

The sudden postponement of Smriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal’s wedding has created a wave of curiosity, confusion, and concern among fans across the country. What was initially assumed to be a delay due to health issues has transformed into one of the most widely discussed online controversies of the year. As scattered claims, alleged screenshots, and personal statements began emerging across social platforms, a new individual unexpectedly entered the spotlight — a woman identified online as Mary D’Costa.

According to circulating online chatter, Mary is the person whom many users believe may be connected to the rumours surrounding the couple’s relationship. The wedding, originally planned with extensive celebrations and attended by close friends and teammates, was called off abruptly, and the lack of clarity gave way to countless assumptions. While none of the accusations have been confirmed by the families involved, the discussions have grown louder as more alleged conversations and personal statements began surfacing online.

What makes the situation even more complex is the contrast between the official reasons shared for the postponement and the parallel social media narrative that suggested something entirely different. Fans who were once celebrating the couple’s journey suddenly found themselves trying to decode unverified chats, deleted posts, and emotional speculation. In the middle of all this, Mary D’Costa unexpectedly became a name that online users started connecting to the story, despite the absence of confirmed details about her role or profession.

The Rising Speculation After the Postponement

The wedding was initially postponed following a medical emergency involving Smriti’s father, who reportedly required urgent treatment. Shortly afterward, Palash also underwent medical care, leading both families to pause the celebrations indefinitely. While this alone was enough to shock fans, the situation escalated when social media claims began suggesting the existence of private conversations allegedly involving Palash and another woman.

Within hours, screenshots claimed to be of messages shared between Palash and Mary began circulating across multiple social platforms. These posts quickly went viral, as users speculated whether these alleged exchanges may have contributed to the emotional strain surrounding the wedding. Although the authenticity of these images has not been verified, the discussions around them have dominated the online narrative.

Several users pointed out that Smriti removed all wedding-related photos and videos from her social accounts soon after the postponement. Her teammates who had shared glimpses of the pre-wedding celebrations reportedly did the same. This intensified speculation, as fans attempted to interpret these actions through the lens of the ongoing rumours, even though no official statement linked the deletions to any personal misunderstanding.

Who Is Mary D’Costa According to Online Conversations?

Various online posts have attempted to describe Mary D’Costa in different ways, but there is no unified or confirmed description of her background. Some users speculated that she may have been associated with the wedding preparations, while others claimed she works in fields unrelated to choreography. Several profiles under her name were switched to private once the controversy escalated, making it harder to determine factual information about her identity.

Adding to the confusion, a message claimed to be from Mary gained traction online, where the woman alleged that she had exchanged messages with Palash for a brief period months earlier. She reportedly claimed that she never met him in person and that the chats surfaced only after she felt uncomfortable with the direction the interactions were taking.

She also reportedly expressed distress over the online backlash and clarified that she neither intended to cause trouble nor expected her name to be pulled into a situation involving a high-profile couple’s wedding. However, without any confirmed statements from the involved families, the narrative surrounding her continues to rely heavily on unverified claims.

The Alleged Messages and Their Online Impact

The unconfirmed screenshots circulating online appear to suggest that Palash engaged in flirtatious exchanges while being in a public relationship. These images describe conversations where he allegedly complimented Mary, discussed personal topics, and avoided directly addressing questions related to his relationship with Smriti.

In some alleged chats, he reportedly described his relationship as strained due to long-distance commitments, while in others, he suggested casual meet-ups involving swimming sessions, spa visits, and early morning outings. These details, whether true or fabricated, quickly fueled doubt and criticism from fans who were already trying to process the abrupt wedding postponement.

As more users began sharing the screenshots, the online reaction grew overwhelmingly emotional. Supporters of Smriti expressed disappointment and anger, while others urged caution, reminding everyone that the circulating messages had not been authenticated. The situation soon spiraled into a larger conversation about privacy, public figures, and how quickly unverified claims can shape public sentiment.

The Emotional Response From Fans and the Public

The intensity of the reactions reflected how invested people were in the couple’s story. Fans who had witnessed their joyful pre-wedding photos felt sudden disbelief at the unexpected turn of events. Many wrote posts expressing empathy for Smriti, interpreting her social media silence as emotional distress.

The controversy also led to debates about accountability and trust in public relationships. Although fans passionately shared opinions and theories, others advocated for giving the families space, emphasizing that both were navigating health crises in addition to the sudden wave of public scrutiny.

Regardless of the differing viewpoints, most users agreed that the situation highlighted the risks of private conversations becoming viral content, particularly when they involve public personalities.

The Unknowns That Still Surround the Situation

Despite the widespread discussions and claimed screenshots, certain facts remain unchanged and uncontested:

• The wedding has been postponed indefinitely.
• Smriti’s father experienced a medical emergency.
• Palash also required medical attention around the same time.
• No statement from either family mentions any personal conflict.

Everything else remains within the realm of unverified online speculation. While some claim the chats reflect a deeper issue, others believe that private matters have been magnified in an environment that thrives on sensationalism.

Until official statements are issued, the full truth behind the wedding’s postponement, the alleged conversations, and Mary’s involvement — if any — remains unknown. Online narratives may continue to shift, but the only certain aspect is that both families have requested privacy as they navigate an emotionally challenging time.

Conclusion

This is from the girl who posted those Screenshots of the chats, she is not the choreographer with whom Palash Muchhal cheated. She is one of those girls who he dmed while being in a Relationship with Smriti Mandhana. What a fcking piece of shit & loser. pic.twitter.com/AN7O83SVYu

— S`🪻 (@BewilderedMoses) November 25, 2025

The controversy surrounding the postponed wedding of Smriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal continues to evolve each day. With claims, counterclaims, and unverified screenshots dominating discussions, the situation has become a reminder of how quickly narratives can shift in the digital age. While Mary D’Costa unexpectedly became a central figure in the online discourse, her precise role and identity remain unclear.

As speculation expands, what remains most important is the wellbeing of the individuals involved. Until confirmed details emerge, the responsible approach is to acknowledge the uncertainty and avoid drawing conclusions based solely on digital fragments. The coming days may bring more clarity, but for now, the story remains a mix of fact, assumption, and rapidly spreading online conversations.

Also Read: Smriti Mandhana silent on wedding with Palash Muchhal

« Previous DB vs NW, Pitch Report, Head to Head, Playing 11, AI Prediction