As the much-anticipated second Test between India and New Zealand looms closer, India finds itself in a must-win situation following a disappointing loss in Bengaluru. New Zealand's clinical performance, spearheaded by their bowlers, left the Indian side reeling as they posted their lowest home total, 46, on the scoreboard. Now, with the Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium in Pune set to host the second Test starting October 24, the spotlight is on Team India’s response. With conditions likely favoring spinners, India is expected to make some key changes to their lineup to turn the tide in their favor.
Ravichandran Ashwin, one of India’s most dependable spin bowlers, had a lackluster performance in the first Test. His struggles with both bat and ball were evident as he failed to make the impact expected of him. Ashwin was not only kept underutilized with the ball but also couldn’t provide much-needed breakthroughs despite the favorable conditions. More notably, his fitness concerns have been a point of contention leading up to the second Test.
In light of these factors, Washington Sundar has been added to the squad and may very well take Ashwin's place. Sundar’s recent performances in domestic cricket, including a stellar 152 in the Ranji Trophy, coupled with his capabilities as a lower-order batsman, give India an option that can contribute in both departments. Having previously proven his mettle on the international stage, Sundar offers a fresh dynamic. His ability to bowl economically while keeping the pressure on, particularly on turning pitches like Pune’s, could give India a much-needed edge.
Sundar, known for his all-round abilities, played a crucial role in India's historic Gabba Test win against Australia, where he not only picked up three wickets but also scored valuable runs. His form and versatility make him a prime candidate to replace Ashwin, especially on a surface that will likely cater to spinners.
Mohammed Siraj has been a consistent performer for India in the Test arena, but his recent outings haven’t reflected the form that once made him a spearhead of India’s pace attack. Siraj’s performance in the first Test against New Zealand was below par, managing just two wickets in the first innings and none in the second. His inability to take key wickets when needed most allowed New Zealand to build a formidable total.
In contrast, Akash Deep has been in fine form, especially during the series against Bangladesh, where he picked up five wickets in just two games. Akash’s pace and accuracy have been noted, and his ability to bowl long spells with minimal drop-off in effectiveness makes him a strong contender for inclusion in the playing XI. His recent performances in domestic and international cricket make a compelling case for him to be brought into the side, particularly on a pitch that could favor bowlers who can extract bounce and swing.
Siraj, although a reliable performer, has struggled at home in recent times, with only 19 wickets in 13 home Tests at an average of 36.15. Given Akash Deep’s rising stock, it wouldn’t be surprising to see him get the nod ahead of Siraj for the second Test.
KL Rahul’s form has been a topic of discussion ever since his return from injury. Despite his heroic performances in South Africa, where he notched up a brilliant century, Rahul hasn’t quite been able to replicate that form recently. His scores of 0 and 12 in the first Test against New Zealand only add to the concerns. Rahul’s lack of game time, combined with the stiff competition for spots in the top order, could result in him making way for Shubman Gill, who missed the first Test due to a neck issue.
Gill, on the other hand, has been in terrific form across formats and has established himself as one of India’s top-order mainstays. His ability to tackle pace and spin with equal ease makes him a strong candidate to replace Rahul. Moreover, his knack for playing long innings and building partnerships could provide India with the solidity they desperately need at the top of the order.
In the post-match press conference, Rohit Sharma hinted at potential changes, saying, “It’s always nice to have these types of players waiting to play the game. It was unfortunate that Shubman missed this game, but with the kind of form he has shown, it’s a good sign for the team.” Given Rohit’s remarks, it is highly likely that Gill will be included in the starting XI for the Pune Test.
The first Test in Bengaluru was a wake-up call for the Indian team. Losing by such a significant margin at home was not just a defeat; it was a reminder that no team can be taken lightly, especially in Test cricket. While India’s batting lineup collapsed under the pressure of New Zealand’s disciplined bowling attack, the bowling department also faltered when it came to capitalizing on the favorable conditions. With the Pune pitch expected to assist spinners, India must exploit these conditions to their advantage and make the necessary tactical adjustments.
These three potential changes — Washington Sundar, Akash Deep, and Shubman Gill — could revitalize the Indian side and help them level the series. Sundar’s all-round abilities, Akash Deep’s form, and Gill’s solidity at the top order could be key factors in India’s quest for victory. Pune’s spin-friendly conditions should provide a perfect platform for India to strike back and give New Zealand a taste of their own medicine.
As the Indian team gears up for the second Test, it is clear that changes are on the horizon. The inclusion of players like Sundar, Akash Deep, and Shubman Gill could provide the team with a fresh perspective and the ability to adapt to the challenges posed by New Zealand. Pune’s pitch, which traditionally offers turn and bounce, should work in India’s favor if they make the right choices in their playing XI.
The pressure is on for Rohit Sharma and his team to deliver, and while the first Test was a setback, there is a strong sense of belief that India can bounce back. With smart team selections and a clear strategy, India could very well turn the tables and keep the series alive.
Give Your Feedback