A major political and legal confrontation unfolded in West Bengal as the Enforcement Directorate moved the Calcutta High Court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation probe against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. The development follows a dramatic episode during searches conducted at premises linked to Indian Pac Consulting Private Limited, a political consultancy firm associated with the Trinamool Congress.
The incident has sparked sharp reactions from all sides, with the ruling party alleging political targeting ahead of elections, while the central agency has firmly denied any electoral linkage. At the heart of the controversy lies a money laundering investigation that has now expanded into a high-stakes constitutional and legal battle.
As the matter reaches the High Court, it has triggered a debate on the balance between investigative authority, political power, and the rule of law, drawing national attention to the evolving stand-off between the state government and central agencies.
ED approaches Calcutta High Court seeking CBI probe
The Enforcement Directorate filed a plea before the Calcutta High Court seeking directions for the registration of a CBI FIR against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. The plea alleges that the Chief Minister unlawfully interfered with an ongoing investigation when she entered the premises of I-PAC and the residence of its co-founder during ED searches.
According to the agency, the actions of the Chief Minister amounted to obstruction of lawful search and seizure proceedings carried out under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The ED has argued that such conduct by a constitutional authority undermines statutory powers granted to investigating agencies.
Hearing before Justice Suvra Ghosh
The case has been listed before Justice Suvra Ghosh of the Calcutta High Court, who is scheduled to hear the ED’s plea along with a separate petition filed by the Trinamool Congress. The party has challenged what it described as targeted seizure of documents related to its political activities.
The court is expected to examine competing claims regarding the legality of the search, the conduct of officials present at the scene, and the constitutional implications of a sitting Chief Minister’s intervention during an enforcement action.
Allegations over seizure of documents and electronic evidence
The ED has alleged that during the raid, Mamata Banerjee removed documents and electronic devices from the premises that were being searched. The agency claims that these materials were potential evidence linked to an ongoing money laundering investigation.
Banerjee, however, has stated that the documents in question contained sensitive political information related to her party. The Trinamool Congress has maintained that the seizure process risked exposing confidential party strategy and internal data.
I-PAC’s political association and ED’s clarification
I-PAC has reportedly been working with the Trinamool Congress since after the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, providing political consultancy and campaign-related services. This association became a flashpoint as the searches coincided with heightened political activity in the state.
The ED has categorically denied any connection between the searches and the electoral process. It asserted that the action was strictly part of a criminal investigation initiated years earlier and had no political motive.
Money laundering case linked to coal smuggling
The searches stem from a money laundering case registered in 2020 against businessman Anup Majee, who is accused of leading a large-scale coal smuggling syndicate. The ED has alleged that coal was illegally extracted from leasehold areas and sold to various industrial units.
According to the agency, proceeds from the illegal trade were laundered through multiple channels, including alleged transactions involving corporate entities. The investigation has expanded to examine financial flows connected to the suspected syndicate.
Hawala links and alleged financial transactions
The ED has further claimed that its probe uncovered links between the coal smuggling network and hawala operators. These operators allegedly played a role in layering proceeds of crime to obscure their origin.
One such operator is alleged to have facilitated transactions involving substantial sums of money to entities connected with I-PAC. These allegations form a key component of the agency’s argument for a deeper criminal investigation.
Role of state police during the search
During the searches, officials from the Kolkata Police reportedly arrived at the premises, citing the need to verify the identity of ED officers. The ED has claimed that the situation escalated following the arrival of the Chief Minister.
The agency alleges that its officers were restrained, confined, and prevented from completing their statutory duties, raising serious concerns about interference by state authorities.
ED accuses obstruction under PMLA
In its official statement and court filing, the ED has argued that the actions taken during the search constituted obstruction of justice under the PMLA. It described the incident as a direct assault on the independence of a statutory investigating agency.
The plea emphasizes that when political executives allegedly use state machinery to block investigations, it threatens the very foundation of the rule of law.
TMC counters with allegations of political targeting
The Trinamool Congress has strongly opposed the ED’s claims, alleging that the search and subsequent legal actions are politically motivated. The party has linked the episode to the upcoming assembly elections in West Bengal.
In its petition before the court, the TMC has sought safeguards to prevent any leakage or misuse of party-related information seized during the operation.
Multiple petitions before the High Court
Three separate petitions have been filed before the Calcutta High Court by the Enforcement Directorate, the Trinamool Congress, and I-PAC co-founder Pratik Jain. Each petition raises distinct legal questions regarding authority, accountability, and constitutional limits.
The court’s examination of these petitions is expected to set important precedents on the conduct of investigations involving political figures and the scope of intervention by constitutional authorities.
ED seeks CBI FIR citing need for independent probe
The ED has argued that since the allegations involve the Chief Minister and state police officials, only an independent central agency insulated from state control can conduct a fair investigation. It has therefore sought directions for the CBI to register an FIR.
The plea contends that credible investigation is essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure that statutory powers are not undermined by political influence.
Legal and political implications ahead
The case has far-reaching implications for the relationship between state governments and central investigative agencies. It raises fundamental questions about accountability, federalism, and the limits of executive power.
As the Calcutta High Court prepares to hear the matter, the outcome is expected to shape not only the immediate controversy but also future interactions between political authority and law enforcement in India.
Also Read: Iran Protests Escalate as Internet Cut After Prince Call
