A newly released Bollywood spy thriller has ignited an intense political and cultural debate across India and Pakistan, blurring the lines between cinematic storytelling and real-world geopolitics. While audiences have flocked to theatres, critics and commentators are questioning the deeper implications of how cross-border tensions are portrayed on screen.
The film, headlined by Ranveer Singh, arrives at a time of heightened sensitivity between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. Against a backdrop of recent hostilities and long-standing mistrust, its narrative has amplified emotions, drawing applause from some quarters and sharp condemnation from others.
As the controversy unfolds, the film has become more than just a box-office spectacle. It has evolved into a flashpoint in a larger conversation about nationalism, representation, and the growing intersection between popular cinema and political discourse in South Asia.
A Spy Thriller Set Against Real Geopolitical Fault Lines
The film presents a gritty, high-stakes account of covert intelligence operations unfolding between India and Pakistan. Set largely in Pakistan’s port city of Karachi, the narrative follows an Indian intelligence operative navigating a violent underworld of gangsters and extremist networks.
Though framed as fiction, the story closely mirrors real historical tensions between the two countries, especially those linked to Kashmir. This proximity to real events has made the film particularly provocative, with many viewers struggling to separate cinematic imagination from political messaging.
Ranveer Singh’s Role and the Film’s Central Narrative
Ranveer Singh portrays a hardened intelligence officer tasked with infiltrating hostile networks across the border. His character is depicted as a relentless patriot, driven by sacrifice and duty, operating in a morally complex world shaped by betrayal and violence.
Supporting performances by well-known actors add layers to the narrative, with antagonists symbolising institutional power and criminal influence. The film’s extended runtime allows for elaborate set pieces and emotional arcs, reinforcing its epic ambition.
Why the Film Struck a Nerve in Pakistan
In Pakistan, criticism has centred on how the country, particularly Karachi and its neighbourhoods, is depicted. Critics argue that the city is reduced to a dystopian landscape of lawlessness, stripped of cultural nuance, diversity, and everyday life.
Academics and commentators have pointed out that such portrayals reinforce stereotypes and ignore the complex social and historical realities of one of South Asia’s largest metropolitan centres. Legal action has also been initiated over the alleged misuse of historical imagery and political figures.
Debate Over Historical Accuracy and Representation
One of the most contentious aspects of the film is its selective use of historical references. Critics allege that real individuals and events are woven into the plot without sufficient context, reshaped to fit a nationalist narrative.
This blending of fact and fiction has led to accusations that the film simplifies complex histories into binary notions of heroism and villainy, leaving little room for nuance or critical reflection.
Reception in India: Commercial Success, Critical Divide
In India, the film has enjoyed strong box-office returns and enthusiastic audience responses, particularly among viewers drawn to its patriotic themes. Many have praised its scale, performances, and emotional intensity.
However, the film has not been immune to criticism. Some families of real-life security personnel have objected to what they perceive as unauthorised inspiration drawn from actual events, while critics have raised concerns about ethical storytelling.
Art, Nationalism and the Bollywood Formula
The controversy surrounding the film has reignited debate over Bollywood’s increasing reliance on hyper-nationalistic narratives. Spy thrillers and action dramas centred on national security have become a dominant genre in recent years.
Observers note that these films often favour exaggerated heroism and simplified geopolitical conflicts, resonating with mass audiences but risking the marginalisation of minority voices and alternative perspectives.
Impact on Critics and Freedom of Expression
The backlash has extended beyond the film itself to those who critique it. Several reviewers have reported online harassment and coordinated campaigns aimed at discrediting negative reviews.
Industry bodies have expressed concern over attempts to pressure critics and influence editorial independence, warning that such trends threaten healthy discourse within the creative ecosystem.
Cinema as a Political Force in South Asia
Films in India and Pakistan have long played a role in shaping public perceptions, often reflecting prevailing political moods. In an era of social media amplification, their influence has become even more pronounced.
The spy thriller’s reception demonstrates how cinema can reinforce national narratives, mobilise public sentiment, and sometimes deepen cross-border mistrust, whether intentionally or otherwise.
A Pattern of Politically Charged Storytelling
The film joins a growing list of high-profile releases accused of blurring entertainment with political messaging. Similar controversies in recent years have centred on historical reinterpretations and portrayals of religious or ethnic communities.
Supporters argue that filmmakers have the right to creative freedom, while critics counter that repeated patterns reveal a strategic alignment with dominant political ideologies.
What the Controversy Reveals
At its core, the debate is less about one film and more about the role of popular culture in times of political tension. When fiction echoes reality too closely, it can inflame existing divides rather than encourage understanding.
The storm surrounding the film underscores the responsibility that comes with mass storytelling, especially in regions where history, identity, and politics remain deeply intertwined.
The Road Ahead for Bollywood Spy Films
As audiences continue to consume politically charged cinema, filmmakers face a critical choice between spectacle and sensitivity. The success of such films suggests strong demand, but the backlash signals growing fatigue with one-dimensional narratives.
Whether future projects will adopt more balanced storytelling or double down on confrontational themes will shape not only the industry’s creative direction but also its role in the broader social conversation.
A Film That Became a Diplomatic Talking Point
The spy thriller’s transformation from entertainment to political lightning rod highlights cinema’s power to transcend screens and enter diplomatic and cultural debates.
In doing so, it has reminded both filmmakers and audiences that stories told in darkened theatres can reverberate far beyond box-office numbers, influencing perceptions, politics, and public discourse on both sides of the border.
Also Read: New Education Council Replacing UGC Lacks Funding Powers
About the Author:
Harshit Raj
